THE WHITE HOUSE WILL NEVER RELEASE ALL THE FILES

Yesterday was the day when all the Jeffrey Epstein files were supposed to be released. That didn't happen.

Garcia: In our initial estimation—It could be that we're only getting about 10% of what the DOJ has. And of that 10%, 5% of that has already been released. And the other 5% is highly redacted. So we're getting very little so far

[image or embed]

— Acyn (@acyn.bsky.social) December 19, 2025 at 6:41 PM

What was missing?

Financial records, internal memos from prosecutors who investigated Epstein’s alleged sex-trafficking ring, key material obtained from the searches of Epstein’s palatial homes — none of it figured prominently in the documents released Friday.

Interested in records that would help explain how Epstein grew so wealthy? None to be found.

Want to read emails from federal prosecutors deciding who to charge — and, equally importantly, who not to charge — during their 2019 investigation? You’re out of luck.

Curious about the role of Maurene Comey, the prosecutor who co-led the probes into Epstein and his co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, before being fired without explanation in July? Nothing from her to see here.

We all think the administration is trying to protect Donald Trump, but it may also be trying to protect the kinds of people he regards as his C-suite peers:

... the documents and photos were largely silent about a roster of ... well-known people who have long been associated with Mr. Epstein and his finances, including businessmen like Leon Black and Leslie H. Wexner.

The lead sponsors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act are not satisfied:

Unfortunately, today’s document release by @AGPamBondi and @DAGToddBlanche grossly fails to comply with both the spirit and the letter of the law that @realDonaldTrump signed just 30 days ago. @RepRoKhanna is correct. https://t.co/gZQyQBUT4R

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) December 19, 2025

In his video on X, Khanna said:

“We will prosecute individuals regardless of whether they’re the attorney general, or a career or political appointee. We need full transparency and justice for the survivors.”

He added in his written post: “Any person who attempts to conceal or scrub the files will be subject to prosecution under the law.”

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has promised a drip-drip of files:

“The volume of materials to be reviewed ... means that the Department must publicly produce responsive documents on a rolling basis,” Blanche wrote. “The Department’s need to perform rolling productions is consistent with well-settled case law that statutes should be interpreted to not require the impossible.”

Blanche also said in TV interviews that while “hundreds of thousands” of documents would be released in the initial round, hundreds of thousands more would be processed over the next few weeks.

Maybe this will happen. Maybe a few more documents will trickle out between now and the Monday after New Year's, when normie Americans will be distracted. Or maybe the follow-ups will be like the Trump healthcare plan -- something we're supposed to get in the next two weeks, forever. Whatever happens, I'm certain that we won't get a full document release.

Culturally, the pressure is off. Some documents were released in time to meet the deadline for all of them, and GOP/QAnon voters (the only voters the administration cares about) got what they wanted, more or less: lots of pictures of Bill Clinton. Republican voters don't care about getting to the bottom of this case. They don't care about following the facts wherever they lead. They don't care about justice for the victims. All they care about is their ongoing war against Democrats. They're either happy now or frustrated because they were hoping for evidence against Clinton that was genuinely incriminating. They want Clinton and other people they hate, like Bill Gates, tried and convicted (and maybe executed). But shamed is reasonably satisfying.

Now there's no deadline to meet. No one's going to create a new one. In this Congress, you won't get 218 House members to vote for impeachment of any Republican over this, or vote for any reprimand, really -- remember that one of the few sincere GOP antagonists of the White House on this issue, Marjorie Taylor Greene, is leaving Congress altogether in a couple of weeks.

This just feels like the culmination of the Epstein moment, the Epstein year -- I question whether the moment can be sustained after ordinary people have seen these documents and photos. Most people don't pay close attention to the details of political stories -- I'm sure they believe a lot has come out, not just a tiny percentage. I think this document dump relieved a great deal of the pressure on the White House. And if Democrats win one or both houses of Congress back next year, this might seem like a story that's far back in the rearview mirror by 2027 -- never mind 2029, which is the earliest moment a post-Trump Justice Department could possibly prosecute anyone for failure to comply with this law (and there'll be many more crimes to focus on then, assuming the new administration doesn't just decide to "turn the page").

I hope I'm wrong about this. I hope we don't find ourselves in mid-January with perhaps 15% of the documents released and the White House saying that, well, actually, there are no additional document releases scheduled. But that's what I expect.

BARI WEISS'S ELITIST BUBBLE

A few days before CBS News broadcast Bari Weiss's town hall with Erika Kirk, I said that Weiss didn't really understand the country if she thought Kirk's husband was a universally beloved figure outside a few small liberal enclaves. As YouGov polling has noted, only about half the country was really familiar with Charlie Kirk at the time of his death, and only about a quarter of the country has a favorable opinion of him. After the town hall aired, Variety reported that all but the most desperate advertisers questioned the town hall's viewer appeal and chose to avoid buying time on the broadcast:

During the hour, commercial breaks were largely filled with spots from direct-response advertisers, including the dietary supplement SuperBeets; the home-repair service HomeServe.com; and CarFax, a supplier of auto ownership data. Viewers of the telecast on WCBS, CBS’ flagship station in New York, even saw a commercial for Chia Pet, the terra-cotta figure that sprouts plant life after a few weeks.

Direct-response advertisers typically pay lower prices in exchange for allowing TV networks to put their commercials on air when convenience allows. A flurry of the ads appearing in one program usually offers a signal that the network could not line up more mainstream support for the content it chose to air.

A more monied class of sponsors was evident during the first commercial break appearing in the 9 p.m. hour on CBS, a rebroadcast of a 2024 episode of “48 Hours.” Marketers appearing included Amazon, Ferrero Group, and Procter & Gamble.

And then we learned that the town hall was a ratings flop.

According to early numbers from Nielsen’s Big Data + Panel measurement, the one-hour CBS News town hall ... drew 1.548 million total viewers and 237,000 in the coveted advertising demographic of viewers aged 25 to 54. Those numbers rose to 1.867 million viewers overall 265,000 in the advertising demo when Nielsen released its final numbers Tuesday afternoon.

Based on Nielsen’s final ratings, the Erika Kirk sitdown declined 11 percent in total viewership compared to the network’s standard programming in that time slot year to date – and was down 41 percent in the key demo.

But Weiss and CBS News are undaunted. They're doing more town halls, although the guests seem a bit more upmarket.

CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss is ... launching a series of primetime town halls and debates alongside Weiss’ The Free Press under the banner “Things That Matter.”

CBS says that Vice President JD Vance, Maryland Governor Wes Moore, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman have all agreed to participate in the town halls, with the debates set to address topics like “Does America Need God?” “Has Feminism Failed Women?” and “Should Gen Z Believe in the American Dream?”

CBS has lined up people like Isabel Brown and Harry Sisson to debate the American dream, Steven Pinker and Ross Douthat to debate the God question, and Liz Plank and Allie Beth Stuckey to debate the feminism question.

While Weiss might think she's making CBS News more appealing to Americans in flyover country, what she's really doing is creating a right-leaning version of the sort of lecture series that upper-middle-class Manhattan dwellers love, the kind of programming you'd expect at the 92nd Street Y or the New York Historical Society. I live among these people, and this programming seems maybe a few inches to the right of what they enjoy -- and some of it would be appealing to them just the way it is. They'd flock to a chat with Wes Moore or Sam Altman. They read and occasionally agree with Ross Douthat. And while they might not be J.D. Vance fans now, a Vance talk would have sold out quickly on the Upper East Side or Upper West Side in his pre-Trump days.

All this leads me to believe that while Weiss may have regarded Erika Kirk as a blood-and-soil heroine of the heartland Volk, she also saw her as the head of a well-connected political organization -- just the sort of high achiever (or at least the widow of a high achiever) whose opinions should be valued most.

Weiss thinks other top news media decision makers are out of touch with ordinary Americans, but she's as out of touch as she thinks they are. She thinks Americans sit down in front of the TV after a long day's work hoping to be educated and lectured to. I wonder how many of these broadcasts she'll be allowed to do before her employers pull the plug.

TRUMP'S DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO IMMERSE HIMSELF -- AND THE REST OF US -- IN AN ENTIRELY TRUMP-SHAPED WORLD

You know about the plaques, right?

White House staff updated the so-called “Presidential Walk of Fame” Wednesday by adding lengthy descriptions of each former president, in rhetoric that aligns with President Donald Trump’s – such as calling former President Joe Biden “the worst President in American History.”

As part of the president’s ongoing effort to customize the White House to his liking, Trump set his well-known opinions of each former president in stone by adding plaques underneath the portraits that now hang along the colonnade.

For instance:

“Sleepy Joe was, by far, the worst President in American History,” the plaque underneath Biden’s portrait, which is an autopen as opposed to his official portrait, reads. “Taking office as a result of the most corrupt Election ever seen in the United States.”

We saw those plaques before we heard last night's speech.

Wearing a blue suit, white shirt and red tie, Trump unleashed a shouty stream of consciousness with barely a pause or punctuation mark....

“Eleven months ago, I inherited a mess, and I’m fixing it,” Trump said, starting as he meant to go on by telling a lie: he claimed that inflation was the worst in 48 years when he took office, when in fact it had come back down to 3%.

He went on to place blame at the feet of Biden, previous trade deals, immigrants and what he described as a corrupt system. As at his campaign rallies, Trump painted a lurid picture of Biden forcing “transgender for everybody” and throwing open the border to criminals from insane asylums. He claimed to have “broken the grip of sinister woke radicals in our schools”.

... he conceded that prices remain high while arguing that the nation was “poised” for an economic boom. “I am bringing those high prices down and bringing them down very fast,” he said. By way of example, he claimed a sharp drop in gasoline prices, even though a White House graphic displayed by Fox News as he spoke showed only a slight decline in the national average....

Trump delivered his customary boasts about settling eight wars and bringing peace to the Middle East “for the first time in 3,000 years”. He repeated ugly remarks demonising Somali Americans and echoed European far-right extremists by stating: “We are now seeing reverse migration as migrants go back home, leaving more housing and more jobs for Americans.”

Trump rants on Truth Social. He adds captions to photos in a White House presidential gallery that read like those same Truth Social posts. Then he gives a speech that also sounds like his Truth Social posts. And he has regular press availabilities where his pronouncements sound like ... well, you guessed it.

I see this, I see the changes he's made to the White House, I see his plans for an "Arc de Triumph" in Washington (it amazes me that he's not calling it the "Arc de Trump"), and I think that Trump is trying to create an entire world where everything he sees appears to be of his own making -- his words, his opinions, his visual effects. What's more, he wants the rest of us to live in that world. How dare we not recognize his greatness! How dare we have opinions different from his!

I always go back to the steak story, as recounted by Trump's first wife:

Once she was a Trump, Ivana encountered the patriarch of the family, her husband’s father, real estate developer Fred Trump.

"Fred Trump was [a] really brutal father," she said. "We went to Tavern on the Green for the brunch one Sunday and [Trump’s] father ordered a steak. So all the, you know, the sisters and brothers, they ordered a steak."

"And I said, 'Waiter, can I have a filet of sole? And Fred looked up at the waitress and, 'No, she's going to have a steak.' I look up at the waiter, I said, 'No, Ivana is going to have a filet of sole,' -- because if I would let him just [roll] right over me, it would be all my life and I would not allowed it."

As The New York Times noted when it reviewed the book, Donald took his father's side rather than his wife's.

... Ivana holds firm. Donald doesn’t back Ivana up then or afterward, but rather is displeased that she didn’t knuckle under: “Why didn’t you just have a friggin’ steak?”

Or as Donald said when asked about this on a separate occasion:

Mr. Trump defended his father’s conduct. “He would’ve said that out of love,” he said. If his father had overruled her fish order, Mr. Trump said, “he would have said that only on the basis that he thought, ‘That would be better for her.’”

More than anyone else, Fred Trump is the man who made Donald the monster he is today. Donald Trump believes what his father believed: Do what I want. Think what I think. That would be better for you.

As I said on social media:

Bill Clinton: I feel your pain. Donald Trump: I don't feel your pain, and neither do you.

— Steve M. (@stevemnomoremister.bsky.social) December 18, 2025 at 6:12 AM

Trump thinks it would be better for all of us if we believed the lies he tells himself about his own greatness and every rival's inferiority. More than 40% of the country is still on board with that, but the majority of us aren't. So Trump thinks he'll just have to shout his words louder.

WHY THE SUSIE WILES STORY WILL CHANGE NOTHING

You might have expected the Vanity Fair profile of Susie Wiles to cause friction in Trump World and harm the administration overall. But I regret to say that the Trumpers are responding shrewdly. Rachael Bade, a former Politico journalist, writes on her Substack:

Within hours, the long tail of Wiles’ power and deep relationships across Trump World whipped into a rescue mission. Without so much as a summons, longtime allies from the campaign trail and others inside her orbit cleared their schedules and showed up at the White House to ask how they could help, I’m told from multiple sources. During a huddle in the West Wing, a fire crackling in Wiles’ office, they set to work on a damage-control plan to push back on the story as unfair — and activated the entire Cabinet.

All day, MAGA figures and Cabinet secretaries alike took to social media to defend Wiles and deride the story as a “hit piece” with “cherry-picked” quotes taken out of context....

“That’s called circling the motherfucking wagons,” as one Wiles loyalist and Trump ally told me tonight. “If you look at the reaction on the Hill, if you look at MAGA World and all the people who rallied behind her in a period of eight hours, it shows the depth of loyalty to the president. It shows the depths of loyalty to the chief of staff.”

For example:

Hilarious. The WH had all the Cabinet members simultaneously put out statements supporting Susie Wiles after the Vanity Fair article came out.

[image or embed]

— Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) December 16, 2025 at 12:34 PM

Wiles, a seasoned political operator, is pretending she was snookered.

Lady with obvious daddy issues who is wily as fuck pretends she was snookered by an all powerful magazine writer. Hey, Susie: It’s 2025 and you have been the main handmaiden to your boss dad’s heinous war against the media. As if you are a victim.

[image or embed]

— Kara Swisher (@karaswisher.bsky.social) December 16, 2025 at 7:42 PM

That will be persuasive to the only voters Trump and his aides care about: the base. They think literally every story they don't like is 100% fabricated, so they'll believe that there was some "context" in which the things Wiles said didn't have the plain meanings they obviously had.

There's another reason this won't have an impact:

Trump and Vance literally said they agreed with Wiles, Musk has acknowledged his ketamine habit, and Vought probably thinks Wiles was complimenting him.

[image or embed]

— Steve M. (@stevemnomoremister.bsky.social) December 17, 2025 at 8:36 AM

Trump addressed the "alcoholic's personality" assertion in a phone conversation with a New York Post reporter:

“No, she meant that I’m — you see, I don’t drink alcohol. So everybody knows that — but I’ve often said that if I did, I’d have a very good chance of being an alcoholic. I have said that many times about myself, I do. It’s a very possessive personality,” Trump said, a teetotaler who has frequently cited the 1981 death of his older brother Fred at age 42 of an alcohol-induced heart attack as the main impetus for his abstinence.

Vance copped to conspiratorialism in a speech yesterday afternoon.

"But, conspiracy theorist. Sometimes I am a conspiracy theorist, but I only believe in the conspiracy theories that are true," he [said] as the crowd cheered and applauded. "And by the way, Susie and I have joked in private and in public about that for a long time."

And we know Musk has no shame about his drug use, nor does Vought have any shame about his extremism. In fact, one of the main reasons the White House doesn't see this as damaging is clearly the fact that Wiles accused the administration of doing things and believing things the rest of us think are unconscionable, but Republicans don't. Trump freed even the most violent January 6 rioters? Trump's base loves that! Trump is leaving hundreds of thousands of people to die by shuttering USAID programs? The base thinks it's a good thing when non-Europeans from countries that are seen as shitholes die painfully! Compassion? Soft power? Who cares! And so on.

And finally, the president is presumably fine with the story because Wiles made her deference to him clear:

“There have been a couple of times where I’ve been outvoted,” Wiles said. “And if there’s a tie, he wins.”

As did Vance:

Vance described Wiles’s approach to the chief’s job. “There is this idea that people have that I think was very common in the first administration,” he told me, “that their objective was to control the president or influence the president, or even manipulate the president because they had to in order to serve the national interest. Susie just takes the diametrically opposite viewpoint, which is that she’s a facilitator, that the American people have elected Donald Trump. And her job is to actually facilitate his vision and to make his vision come to life.”

Sure, she said he doesn't understand the details of what his administration is doing. On USAID:

“The president doesn’t know and never will,” she told me. “He doesn’t know the details of these smallish agencies.”

But Trump is proud of his ignorance. He believes he has such a superior brain that he makes better decisions without knowing what he's talking about than other presidents have made after learning the facts.

So, sadly, the White House is shrugging this off. The voters Trump and his people care about will be unfazed. The rest of us are horrified, but the White House doesn't care what we think and never will.

SUSIE WILES IS A UVALDE COP

Vanity Fair has published a two-part story based on interviews with White House chief of staff Susie Wiles. The Trump White House is full of absolute monsters -- the president himself as well as Stephen Miller, Russell Vought, Robert Kennedy Jr., Pete Hegseth, Pam Bondi, and Kristi Noem, among others -- and it's generally conceded that Wiles is not one of those monsters. But like many of the other non-sociopaths who fill out the administration -- think Marco Rubio, for instance -- she won't choose morals or principles when they conflict with her ambition. She might have twinges of conscience, and they might explain why she's been talking to the author of the Vanity Fair piece, Chris Whipple, since the 2024 campaign. Or it might be that she wants to resign soon -- presidential chiefs of staff don't usually stay in the job very long -- and use this controversial profile as a pitch for a high-dollar memoir deal or a lucrative, low-stress TV gig.

In any case, she's never acted on any of her qualms about Trump in a serious way. If this profile is how she lets the world know that she thinks the Trump administration has done some reprehensible things, then she's a Uvalde cop, someone who dithered while bad things were done, apparently determined to save her own neck. She portrays this as a matter of job philosophy, according to J.D. Vance:

Vance described Wiles’s approach to the chief’s job. “There is this idea that people have that I think was very common in the first administration,” he told me, “that their objective was to control the president or influence the president, or even manipulate the president because they had to in order to serve the national interest. Susie just takes the diametrically opposite viewpoint, which is that she’s a facilitator, that the American people have elected Donald Trump. And her job is to actually facilitate his vision and to make his vision come to life.”

So she expresses her qualms, then shrugs and goes back to work.

... Trump issued pardons to almost everyone convicted in the bloody January 6, 2021, assault on the Capitol, in which nine people ultimately died and 150 were injured. Even rioters who’d beaten cops within an inch of their lives were set free. (Fourteen people convicted of seditious conspiracy had their sentences commuted.)

Did she ever ask the president, “ ‘Wait a minute, do you really want to pardon all 1,500 January 6 convicts, or should we be more selective?’”

“I did exactly that,” Wiles replied. “I said, ‘I am on board with the people that were happenstancers or didn’t do anything violent. And we certainly know what everybody did because the FBI has done such an incredible job.’ ” (Trump has said his FBI investigators were “corrupt” and part of a “deep state.”) But Trump argued that even the violent offenders had been unfairly treated. Wiles explained: “In every case, of the ones he was looking at, in every case, they had already served more time than the sentencing guidelines would have suggested. So given that, I sort of got on board.” (According to court records, many of the January 6 rioters pardoned by Trump had received sentences that were lighter than the guidelines.) “There have been a couple of times where I’ve been outvoted,” Wiles said. “And if there’s a tie, he wins.”

You can argue that this wasn't a good enough reason for Wiles to fall on her sword -- no one was directly harmed by these pardons. That's not the case with the administration's assault on USAID, and Wiles knew that.

[Elon] Musk triggered the first true crisis of the Trump presidency and an early test for Wiles. Trump’s chief was shocked when the SpaceX founder eviscerated USAID, the United States Agency for International Development. “I was initially aghast,” Wiles told me. “Because I think anybody that pays attention to government and has ever paid attention to USAID believed, as I did, that they do very good work.”

In his executive order freezing foreign aid, Trump had decreed that lifesaving programs should be spared. Instead, they were shuttered. “When Elon said, ‘We’re doing this,’ he was already into it,” said Wiles. “And that’s probably because he knew it would be horrifying to others. But he decided that it was a better approach to shut it down, fire everybody, shut them out, and then go rebuild. Not the way I would do it.” ...

Wiles says she called Musk on the carpet. “You can’t just lock people out of their offices,” she recalls telling him. At first, Wiles didn’t grasp the effect that slashing USAID programs would have on humanitarian aid. “I didn’t know a lot about the extent of their grant making.” But with immunizations halted in Africa, lives would be lost. Soon she was getting frantic calls from relief agency heads and former government officials with a dire message: Thousands of lives were in the balance.

So she knew.

But Musk forged ahead—all throttle, no brake. “Elon’s attitude is you have to get it done fast. If you’re an incrementalist, you just won’t get your rocket to the moon,” Wiles said. “And so with that attitude, you’re going to break some china. But no rational person could think the USAID process was a good one. Nobody.”

Some rational people would have wanted to fight harder or disassociate themselves from an administration that was about to leave hundreds of thousands of people to die. Wiles chose to be a Uvalde cop.

She's not alone. The father of one of the programs Musk gutted effectively did nothing.

The shuttering of USAID crippled the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). The antiretroviral program, launched with $15 billion by George W. Bush in 2003, was credited with preventing millions of deaths. It depended on USAID grants....

Bush himself had gotten wind of the gutting of PEPFAR. He called Rubio to express alarm, according to a former aide close to Bush.

I want you to read this quote about George W. Bush closely. I hope it infuriates you as much as it infuriates me. I've highlighted that parts that are particularly enraging:

“He’s been appalled by Trump from the beginning and he’s determined not to weigh in,” the aide said. But Musk’s attack on one of his legacy achievements was too much. Bush, said that person, “cares deeply about the PEPFAR program. That and Wounded Warriors are the two things where he will weigh in, not publicly, but with intention.”

Lives were in the balance, and Bush cared -- but it would have been unseemly for him to express that concern publicly. It's just not done! Trump is a fellow Republican, and one mustn't stir up trouble within the party, even if thousands of lives are at stake, and even if your words as a former president of the United States would carry great weight.

Reading this now is especially appalling because it comes at a time when a few Republicans are finally challenging Trump on some issues, at some personal risk. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Indiana state legislators are receiving death threats, but they're acting. Wiles did nothing. Bush did nothing.

Even Peter Baker of The New York Times can see Wiles's spinelessness.

President Trump’s chief of staff said she tried to get him to end his “score settling” against political enemies after 90 days in office, but acknowledged that the administration’s still ongoing push for prosecutions has been fueled in part by the president’s desire for retribution.

Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff, told an interviewer that she forged a “loose agreement” with Mr. Trump to stop focusing after three months on punishing antagonists, an effort that evidently did not succeed. While she insisted that Mr. Trump is not constantly thinking about retribution, she said that “when there’s an opportunity, he will go for it.”

... Ms. Wiles confided in Mr. Whipple in March that she had told Mr. Trump that his presidency was not supposed to be a retribution tour.

“We have a loose agreement that the score settling will end before the first 90 days are over,” she said then. When that did not happen by August, she told Mr. Whipple that “I don’t think he’s on a retribution tour” but said that he was aiming at people who did “bad things” in coming after him. “In some cases, it may look like retribution,” she said. “And there may be an element of that from time to time. Who would blame him? Not me.”

If this ends with Susie Wiles resigning and getting a cushy, high-paying cable-news commentator job while she works on a seven-figure memoir, that's another failure of our political culture. She had power. She didn't use it. She could have fought the administration's psychopaths. In real time, like the cops in Uvalde, she just allowed them to keep hurting people.

IN HIS RESPONSE TO ROB REINER'S DEATH, TRUMP IS JUST EXPRESSING THE VIEWS OF HIS BASE

You've probably seen Donald Trump's repulsive Truth Social response to the death of Rob Reiner and his wife:

A very sad thing happened last night in Hollywood. Rob Reiner, a tortured and struggling, but once very talented movie director and comedy star, has passed away, together with his wife, Michele, reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS. He was known to have driven people CRAZY by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump, with his obvious paranoia reaching new heights as the Trump Administration surpassed all goals and expectations of greatness, and with the Golden Age of America upon us, perhaps like never before. May Rob and Michele rest in peace!

Trump adds his usual narcissism and a desperate attempt to convince us, yet again, that we're living through an era of peace and prosperity, but apart from that, his meanspiritedness reflects the viewpoint of his angry base, which has been told for decade that Democrats and liberals are unspeakably evil and the cause of all misery and suffering in America. You can see that by going to the comments in response to stories about the Reiners' deaths on right-wing sites.

At Fox News, the commenters pat themselves on the back for not being haters while ... being haters:

Although he would never do the same for me based on who I voted for, and would probably in fact, wish me dead... rest in peace. Hopefully you don’t carry that weird anger to the pearly gates. They aren’t a fan of that I hear.

****

It sounds like there may be irony in Reiner's presumed death and his politics. We'll see. Regardless, I have never rooted for or cheered anyone's death and never will. I will admit Joe Biden has really pushed that resolve.

****

If he was a conservative the liberals would be cheering in the streets ... they’ve already proven that. That’s one difference between us and them. RIP Mr Reiner.

****

Dont wish death upon anyone but he has been quite hateful the last 10-15 years....if roles were reversed I can easily imagine the comments on her by progressives and liberals against the other side. RIP you deserve peace after all that hate.

****

Didn’t hear from the Hollywood crowd after the murder of two American patriots in Syriia yet everyone is so devastated about Reiner and his wife. our priorities are definitely misguided.

Having said that may they all rest in peace.

****

After reading many of the comments here, I want to say that the difference between Republicans and Democrats is mind blowing.

Almost every comment here is sad by this, loved him as a director and not his politics.

If he had been a Republican, the left would be happy he was dead.

****

He did give us ' This Is Spinal Tap ' and ' When Harry Met Sally'. Unfortunately his TDS overwhelmed him.

****

Unfortunately, the torment he felt under Trump may be nothing compared to what he is currently experiencing.

****

Unlike liberals who would be joyful at this news if Mr. Reiner were a conservative. I find it extremely sad that a tragedy such as this has happened to the Reiner family. No one deserves to have this happen to them and I pray for both Mr. and Mrs. Reiner as well as the Reiner family. Hopefully they will be allowed to mourn in peace.

****

It would be easy for me to make a terrible comment about another TDS sufferer here. But I will not stoop to this level. So I will just say that to his relatives, I'm sorry for your loss.

****

I do not wish ill on others, even if Reiner himself would not/did not behave the same way towards conservatives, it doesn't do any good to spread hate.

The commenters responding to Breitbart's story largely dispense with the self-congratulation and go straight to the hate, some of them focusing on reports that the Reiners may have been stabbed by their son, who has struggled with substance abuse:

Trump will get the blame for sinking the son's drug supply.

****

Rob R pushed so much of this stuff on society. We didn’t want him to pass away like this, nor his wife, but it’s the way Rob R would have wanted it.

****

Was absolutely pisses me off, both of them what liked the dems solution: muslims all over the place, chinese buying land near our military bases, somolis in Minneapolis ripping us taxpayers off for billions.
Ya that is thee solution to getting rid of Trump.

****

He was always running his mouth about Trump being a dictator but never said a world about rampant crime in California caused by his buddy Newscum.

****

Democrats have no solutions only chaos.

****

I have said for years that if open season was declared on drug dealers and they were executed on site, and left at the curb for the trash collectors that within six months there wouldn't be a drug dealer anywhere to be found. Trump is trying to eradicate the supply/suppliers, yet democrats want him to leave them alone. Who are the bad guys? DEMOCRATS.

****

It is amazing to me the Democrats are violently defending letting drug dealers and criminal narco terrorists and gangs into our country. And that they are even a party any more when they are defending these people. But I guess this is proof that we aren't fighting people, but forces of darkness. Because even the stupidest people don't want chaos, crime, and enemy gangs who deal in prostitution, r*pe trafficking and drugs from third world countries to tear their homes and neighborhoods apart.

****

Democraps know this creates chaos. That’s why they promote it along with their other favorite bad for society stuff.

****

I guess you have to have sympathy for the parent. But I know a flaming lib that lost his middle aged son to Fentanyl. But he'd scream about blowing up the drug boats. Just people who shouldn't be in charge of anything.

****

Guess he should have spent less time crying about Trump and more time trying to get his son into rehab.

****

Alleged celebrities with drug addled children are now looking over their shoulders.
Hey, it takes a village.

****

Democrats are violent, psychotic filth and should not be allowed near sharp objects or guns. Don't turn your back to them. Never, ever let them near the children.

****

WE NEED ACROSS THE BOARD COMMON SENSE LIBERAL CONTROL LAWS.

One commenter assumes the son was trans:

Because of his Radical Left TDS, he programmed and groomed a "tran" kid who probably received psychotic drugs and went full mental and took Reiner's life and his wife. Radical Liberalism is a disease!

Another is appalled at the possibility that the White House press corps might ask Trump to comment on the Reiners' deaths:

Next WH press corp question: "Are you sorry Rob Reiner was murdered?" Don't be stunned when it comes. I still remember them asking if Trump was sorry the South lost the Civil War. They should simply have been thrown out, and I don't remember what outfit asked it, but they should NEVER have been let a toe over the threshold ever again.

Well, not to worry -- Trump already told us what's in his repulsive heart. And much of his base is no better.

(Updated:) THE FOX NEWS SITE HAS AN NBA PLAYER'S TAKE ON THE SYDNEY SHOOTING, BUT NOT THE NAME OF THE HERO WHO DISARMED A GUNMAN

The lead story at the Fox News website right now is the story that leads the news all over the world: the shooting at a Hanukkah celebration on Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia, which killed at least 12 people. Authorities are treating the massacre as an act of anti-Semitic terrorism.

There was a moment of heroism in the midst of all this carnage: an unarmed bystander rushed one of the shooters and disarmed him.

AUSTRALIAN HERO TOOK GUN OFF SHOOTER

TERROR ATTACK SYDNEY AT LEAST TEN DEAD

AUSTRALIAN HERO TOOK DOWN GUNMAN pic.twitter.com/mK6AODVct5

— Victor Ohaka (@OhakaVictor) December 14, 2025

The man who did this -- and who took gunfire in the process -- has been identified as a Muslim immigrant named Ahmed al Ahmed, the owner of a fruit shop in Sutherland. You'll find his name in stories from The Jerusalem Post, The Times of Israel, and even Murdoch-owned outlets such as News.com.au and the New York Post. His identity has been known for several hours. This was posted five hours ago:



But so far at least, his name is nowhere to be found on the Fox News site. It appears nowhere in Fox's main story on the massacre. Fox has posted video of the takedown, but the hero isn't named.

Fox did, however, manage to rush this story onto the front page:

NBA champion calls on officials to 'publicly hang' Australian terrorists after attack at Hanukkah event

NBA champion Andrew Bogut reacted to the terror attack in Australia that left at least a dozen dead and nearly 30 others injured on Sunday at a Hanukkah celebration.

Bogut suggested that X was being censored in the Bondi Beach area of Sydney. He also called for the hanging of the shooters if they were still alive.

"X being heavily sensored (sic) amidst this shooting in Bondi, Australia," Bogut wrote on X. "Have to have the main stream media version events rather than live feeds just in case the truth gets out without any spin.

"RIP to the people caught up in this BS. Publicly hang the shooters if still alive."

Bogut added, "Thinking you can vote your way out of this mess is beyond naive......."

Priorities....

*****

UPDATE: Fox wises up -- the lead headline on the Fox site is now

WATCH: Muslim man risks life to disarm suspect during deadly terror attack at Hanukkah event

I've been poking around the right-o-sphere. This man is being praised even at some of the most Islamophobic sites. I guess it took a while to decide it was safe to praise a Muslim, but Fox finally came around.

Now let's see if Breitbart can do the same. One of its front-page headlines is "WATCH: HERO DISARMS JIHADIST," but the linked story includes just a clip with footage of the takedown, and no identification of the man responsible. A separate story, "Watch: Heroic Bystander Tackles, Disarms Terrorist Gunman at Bondi Beach," has been up for hours, but hasn't been updated with the hero's name.

*****

UPDATE: I'm complaining about Fox and Breitbart, but Kevin Kruse notes that The New York Times isn't identifying the hero in Sydney either:

This is the entire piece, last updated a half hour ago. They never give the name of the bystander, Ahmed el Ahmed, and they never note that he’s Muslim. Other outlets have done so, but not the NYT.

[image or embed]

— Kevin M. Kruse (@kevinmkruse.bsky.social) December 14, 2025 at 4:36 PM

(Ironically, Bret Stephens names Ahmed al-Ahmed in the first paragraph of an otherwise awful column titled "Bondi Beach Is What ‘Globalize the Intifada’ Looks Like," which flatly blames Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese and pro-Palestinian demonstrators worldwide for the massacre.)

Meanwhile, Elon Musk's Grok goes one step further, citing a fake story that identifies the hero as a white IT guy named Edward Crabtree.

This is fucking grim. Somebody invented a white guy, an "IT professional" named Edward Crabtree, who stopped the Bondi shooting and spread it all over the internet, which was picked up by AI agents and slop aggregation sites. The real hero is a fruit stand owner named Ahmed el Ahmed.

[image or embed]

— Tim Onion (@bencollins.bsky.social) December 14, 2025 at 3:02 PM

The man who killed the terrorist his name is not Ahmed, his name is Edward Crabtree.
So don't be fooled by any Jihadi, there is no such thing as a good Muslim or a bad Muslim, they are just Muslims.#bondibeach pic.twitter.com/O5v5BOdpJN

— Ankit Ji ꪜ (@AnkitJi429886) December 14, 2025

Site that was spreading the lie that the person who stopped one of the shooters in the horrific attack in #BondiBeach is named Edward Crabtree instead of Ahmed Al Ahmad was registered today in Iceland

Informing people to stop the spread of this fake news pic.twitter.com/tiNb5NBrbg

— Eels 💚 (@eelsinmyhandle) December 14, 2025